First in Care: Inside Access's Commitment to Agentic AI

The conversation around AI in social care is no longer a question of "if" but "how" and how fast. As government and sector bodies increasingly turn their attention to AI's role in the sector, Access has moved from talk to action, becoming the first provider in social care to embed agentic AI directly into its platform. Anisa Appleby-Byrne, General Manager of Care at The Access Group, explains the thinking behind the move, the problems it's designed to solve, and what comes next. 

10 minutes

Written by Anisa Appleby-Byrne.

Posted 24/08/2026

carer on tablet

Q: Access has made agentic AI a core part of its platform, not a bolt-on feature. What's driving that level of commitment?

A: The frustration in care has never been a shortage of technology, it's fragmented systems that don't talk to each other, mountains of admin that pile up as a result, and less time left to improve outcomes for the people being cared for. The Evo Agentic Platform isn't a tool alongside our care software, it's the foundation our products and all our data plug into, from care planning and medication to rostering and compliance. That matters because the intelligence sees the whole picture of a service and can genuinely help, rather than being trapped inside one screen. A bolt-on can tidy up a note; a platform that everything connects into can notice a change in someone's needs, help update their plan, prompt the right person and bring together the evidence a team needs, all from the same information.

The commitment comes from a simple belief: fragmented technology creates admin and risk, while connected intelligence gives time back and makes care safer. 

"Bolt-on AI gives you a cleverer app. A platform everything plugs into gives your team something closer to a trusted colleague, one that already knows your whole service and gets the tasks done that usually take up so much time”

Q: Why did Access move first, and what does that say about the company's ambitions for the sector?

A: Honestly, it came down to the people. Care teams give so much of themselves every day, and it's hard to watch that energy get swallowed up by fragmented systems and endless admin, because every hour lost to that is an hour that could have been spent with someone who needs them. We didn't want providers waiting any longer for something better. The way to give that time back, and to improve outcomes, isn't another standalone tool, it's intelligence that works across everything a provider already runs.

That's how the Evo Agentic Platform is built: our products and all our data, care planning, medication, rostering, compliance, plug into it, so it sees the whole picture of a service and can genuinely help, rather than being trapped inside one screen. When everything connects into one platform and it carries the connective, administrative load, the result is felt where it matters: more time with people, and safer, better-informed care because nothing slips between systems. Our ambition is a simple one, to help raise the standard of care across the whole sector, so that better outcomes through less admin become something every provider can offer, not just the fortunate few. 

"We moved first because time is the one thing you can't give back to a carer once admin has taken it. Our job is to hand those hours back, to people, and to care."

Q: What is it about the current state of social care, the pressures, the gaps, that made this the right moment?

A: The sector is being asked to do more, for more people, with the same hands or fewer. Demand is rising, budgets are stretched, and the workforce is under real pressure, and on top of all that, fragmented systems and relentless admin mean so much of a carer's day disappears into documentation, chasing information across disconnected tools, and rebuilding rotas by hand. That gap, between the work that matters and the admin that surrounds it, is exactly where this technology earns its place, because closing it means more time to improve outcomes. In practice that's Smart Notes capturing voice notes and completing assessments instantly to cut down on admin, and intelligent scheduling matching the right staff and skills to real demand, reducing overspend and improving continuity for the people being cared for.

The moment is right because the technology has finally matured enough to carry this load safely, and because, frankly, the sector can't afford for it not to. Every hour handed back is an hour returned to a person, not a form.  

"People don't come into care to fight paperwork. Our job is to give them back the hours that admin has been quietly taking away."

Q: How is agentic AI fundamentally different from the AI tools care providers may already be using, and why does that distinction matter? 

A: Most AI a provider has met so far is reactive - you ask, it answers; you prompt, it drafts. And because it usually sits on top of the same fragmented systems, it adds another disconnected tool rather than removing admin. Agentic AI completes whole pieces of work rather than waiting to be told the next step, anticipating what's needed and bringing it to the surface at the right moment. That's the difference between something that writes a note when asked and a system that notices a change in someone's needs, helps update the plan, prompts the right person, and readies the evidence a team relies on, because everything connects into it, not one screen. The distinction matters because in care, the cost of something being missed isn't a lost sale, it's a risk to a vulnerable person. That kind of support only works safely when it's built on connected, well-governed information, which is exactly why we built the Evo Agentic Platform as the foundation our products and data plug into, rather than bolting AI on. Fragmented tools widen the gaps and pile on admin; a platform everything connects into closes them and gives the time back.  

Q: Trust is a real issue in this sector when it comes to AI taking on more autonomous tasks. How does Access think about that responsibility?

A: In care, trust isn't a feature, it's the foundation. Get it wrong and nothing else matters. We hold ourselves to that on three levels. First, governance: Access is ISO 42001 accredited for responsible and ethical AI, specifically to guard against bias and privacy concerns, and the Evo Agentic Platform was built with a three-tier security model in a secure, closed environment. Second, clear boundaries: our technology is deliberately kept in its lane - Access Care Planning does not make diagnoses, clinical risk assessments or treatment recommendations; those decisions stay with qualified professionals using their own judgment. The platform carries the load; the person always makes the decision. Third, discipline with data: however much plugs into the platform, the intelligence only ever works within the boundary of an organisation's own information.

Trust in care has to be earned, and it's earned by being open about what the technology does, what it deliberately won't do, and who remains accountable. We would always rather move a little more carefully with something we can stand behind than quickly with something we can't. 

"The technology carries the load. The person always holds the decision. In care, that line is not negotiable."

Q: Where does this leave Access, and the sector, in three to five years' time?

A: The Access Group bets on Agentic AI as the future of social care, and wants the rest of the sector to follow 

Social care has a well-worn problem: not too little technology, but too much of it pulling in different directions. Systems that don't talk to each other. Admin that swallows hours better spent with the people who need care. It's a frustration most providers know intimately, and one The Access Group is betting agentic AI can finally solve. 

Access has become the first provider in the sector to embed agentic AI directly into its platform, rather than treating it as an add-on feature. The distinction matters more than it might sound. Its Evo Agentic Platform sits underneath everything — care planning, medication, rostering, compliance — meaning the AI sees a service's whole picture rather than operating inside one isolated screen. 

"Bolt-on AI gives you a cleverer app," says Anisa Appleby-Byrne, General Manager of Care at The Access Group. "A platform everything plugs into gives your team something closer to a trusted colleague — one that already knows your whole service and gets the tasks done that usually take up so much time." 

That colleague-like quality is the point. Rather than simply responding to prompts, the system is designed to notice when something changes — a shift in someone's needs, a gap in a rota — and act on it: updating plans, alerting the right person, assembling the evidence a team needs, all pulled from information the system already holds. 

It's an ambitious claim in a sector where trust in AI is still being earned. Appleby-Byrne is careful to draw a hard line around it: clinical decisions stay firmly with qualified professionals, and the platform — built on ISO 42001-accredited governance — is designed to support, not replace, human judgment. 

"The technology carries the load," she says. "The person always holds the decision. In care, that line is not negotiable." 

Whether that balance holds at scale may determine how much of the sector follows where Access has now moved first. 

We support all types of care providers throughout UK, the team is ready help.