<!-- Bizible Script --> <script type="text/javascript" class="optanon-category-C0004" src="//cdn.bizible.com/scripts/bizible.js" ></script> <!-- End Bizible Script -->

Fixing Child Safeguarding's Information Gap

Child safeguarding in England has never been better resourced, better regulated, or better understood. And yet the same failures keep appearing in serious case reviews: information that existed but wasn't shared, signals that were visible to one agency but invisible to another, decisions made without the full picture. 

Each serious case review has prompted reform, new guidance, and renewed commitment to multi-agency working, but the fundamental challenge of getting the right information to the right professional at the right time remains, for many councils, largely unsolved. 

Social Care Health & Support
3 minutes
Holly West-Robinson writer on healthcare

by Holly West-Robinson

Writer on healthcare

Posted 15/05/2026

Good Intentions Don't Bridge the Gap Between Systems 

It would be wrong to suggest that councils, health services, schools, and police are not trying to work together. They are. Working Together to Safeguard Children sets clear expectations. Multi-agency safeguarding hubs exist across England. Child protection conferences bring professionals together regularly. 

But collaboration requires shared information, and shared information requires systems that can talk to each other. In most areas, they still can't. A social worker preparing for a strategy meeting has access to the social care record. They do not automatically have sight of a child's current mental health referrals, recent hospital attendances, or medications. That information sits in NHS systems, behind different logins, governed by different data controllers, and accessible (if at all) through a manual process that takes time most practitioners simply do not have. 

Nearly 50,000 children in England were subject to a child protection plan as of March 2024. Each of those cases involves a multi-agency team making high-stakes decisions, often under significant time pressure. The quality of those decisions is shaped, more than most people acknowledge, by the completeness of the information available. 

Reform Is Creating New Urgency 

The Families First Partnership Programme is the most significant structural reform to children's social care in a generation. Rolled out nationally from April 2025, it places multi-agency child protection teams at the heart of local systems and creates a shared framework for family help designed to intervene earlier and more effectively. By March 2027, every local authority in England is expected to have implemented the full model. 

The objective is entirely right, but multi-agency teams can only work as well as the information they share. If a social worker and a mental health practitioner sit in the same room but are working from different, incomplete pictures of a child's circumstances, the structural reform will not on its own produce the outcomes it promises. 

The Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel has consistently identified poor information-sharing between agencies as a factor in cases where intervention came too late. The NSPCC has called explicitly for a consistent identifier for children accessible across health, education, social care, and policing. These are not new observations. They reflect a persistent gap between what the system is expected to do and what the infrastructure currently allows. 

What Good Looks Like 

The good news is that the technology to bridge this gap exists. Real-time integration between health and social care systems, giving practitioners in children's services live access to NHS mental health records within their existing case management workflow, is not a distant aspiration. It is available now, in councils across England. 

When a social worker enters a child protection conference with full sight of the child's current health picture (active referrals, recent contacts, alerts from community nursing, medication) the quality of the conversation changes. Decisions are better informed, health and social care colleagues are working from the same information, and the child receives a more coordinated response. 

This is what genuinely integrated safeguarding looks like. Not just multi-agency in name, but multi-agency in practice, with the data infrastructure to match the intention. 

The Question for Every Director of Children's Services 

As Families First implementation accelerates, the question for every Director of Children's Services is not whether multi-agency data sharing matters. It is whether their current systems actually enable it. 

If the answer is no (or not yet) the gap between ambition and reality is not a governance problem or a culture problem. It is a technology problem, and it has a practical solution. 

For many councils, that solution is Access Intelligent Care Platform (AICP). It connects Rio mental health records with social care case management systems, giving safeguarding practitioners real-time health visibility within the workflow they already use 

As for multi-agency child protection teams, it means that when a child's safety is being assessed, the people in the room finally have everything they need to act. 

The Access Group supports health and social care organisations across England to work more effectively together. Find out how we can help your team get to where they need to be - get in touch today 

Holly West-Robinson writer on healthcare

By Holly West-Robinson

Writer on healthcare

Holly is a Digital Content Writer for Access Group's Health and Social Care division.

Passionate about the transformative power of technology, her writing is centred on digital solutions like virtual wards and integrated care systems, which she believes are essential to prevention and the future of healthcare.