Legal

Is your law firm financially sustainable?

Key insights for managing financial stability following Access Legal's webinar on 13 November 2025 with Brian Rogers, Regulatory Director at Access Legal, and Tom Blandford FCA from Your Law Firm's CFO.

The legal sector faces unprecedented scrutiny of financial management following high-profile firm collapses. The SSB scandal, where a firm accumulated £128 million in debts while the SRA concluded there were no financial stability issues, has fundamentally changed regulatory oversight.

Accounting Compliance Compliance & Risk Management Legal Sector Legal Practice Management
Brian Rogers

by Brian Rogers

Regulatory Director, Access Legal (The Access Group)

Posted 08/12/2025

The SRA's evolving requirements

The SRA has signalled action on financial oversight, with proposed changes including mandatory accountants' reports for all firms, use of third-party managed accounts, new rules on excess funds returns, restrictions on fees in advance, and potential requirements to separate COFA and finance manager roles.

At their recent compliance conference, the SRA Chair stated explicitly that regulatory changes have not gone into the very long grass, so firms should keep watching this space.

Critical warning signs

  • Drawings exceeding profits
    When partners are physically taking more out of the business than their profit share would otherwise have been, this cannot be right over a medium or longer term.
  • The overlooked office account
    While firms obsessively monitor client accounts, office accounts receive far less attention. It's concerning how many law firm managers don't even know how much money is in their office account right now, never mind whether that's been reconciled.

The 13-week rolling cash flow: an early warning system

The single most important financial management tool is a 13-week rolling cash flow forecast - the accountant's answer to financial stability monitoring.

Why 13 weeks?

  • Captures quarterly transactions (rent, VAT payments)
  • Provides actionable timelinessufficient warning to implement fixes
  • Maintains reasonable accuracy unlike 12-month budgets

If a financial review shows figures to be bad, firms have 13 weeks to fix it. It is recommended that updates should be weekly, constantly maintaining a three-month forward view.

Understanding reporting accountants' limitations

Many firms misunderstand what reporting accountants actually do:

  • Client account only - they don't examine office accounts
  • Sampling basis - they don't review every transaction
  • No financial stability assessment - they're not evaluating overall viability

Many firms believe their reporting accountant will have looked at everything and confirmed it's satisfactory, but it is doubtful that this is actually the case in most instances.

Interestingly, Scotland's Law Society employs specialist reporting accountants who systematically review all firms - a model providing far greater oversight than the England and Wales outsourced approach.

Balancing client interests with financial realities

When matters exceed estimates, firms face difficult decisions between billing targets, client expectations, and professional obligations.

Surprisingly, formal cost assessments under the Solicitors Act 1974 often validate 80-90% of disputed fees, demonstrating that proper work is generally recognised as reasonable.

The Mazur impact

The Mazur ruling prohibiting legal executives from conducting reserved litigation activities exemplifies how sudden regulatory changes threaten financial stability.

Very lean and clever firms will adapt, but the transition creates genuine financial pressures; yet most firms are likely to be very loathe to self-report potential insolvency concerns to the SRA.

Best practices for financial sustainability

  1. Implement 13-week rolling cash flow forecasts Update weekly, examining the figure 13 weeks forward.
  2. Reconcile office accounts regularly Match client account diligence - monthly minimum, preferably more frequently.
  3. Conduct monthly variance analysis Lexcel requires quarterly analysis; best practice is monthly, comparing current vs. prior month, same month last year, and budget.
  4. Disaggregate profitability data Break down by department, office, or team. Firms are likely to discover something about their business they didn't previously know.
  5. Verify all invoices Implement systematic checks - some firms still pay fictitious invoices.
  6. Choose qualified reporting accountants Ensure genuine expertise in legal sector compliance, not just lowest cost.

Looking Forward

The SRA currently collects minimal financial data: revenue, profit, and fee type percentages. There would be some logic where they start saying they'd like to know quite a lot more.

Despite economic headwinds - increased National Insurance, cost-of-living pressures, rising employment costs - opportunities exist through cloud-based tools, AI automation, and tech-savvy professionals. It was agreed that while there are lots of economic pressures, there are also lots of economic upsides, so the outlook needn't be entirely pessimistic.

Key takeaways

For managing partners:

  • Implement 13-week rolling cash flow forecasts immediately
  • Ensure office accounts receive equal attention to client accounts
  • Prepare for increased SRA data requirements

For all firms:

  • Financial stability isn't optional - it's a fundamental SRA principle
  • Bad years are acceptable; not knowing about them isn't
  • Forecasting and monitoring prevent crisis situations

Conclusion

The firms that thrive will view financial management as fundamental business intelligence, not a compliance burden. A 13-week rolling cash flow isn't bureaucracy - it's an early warning system.

Most importantly, financial stability challenges are acceptable. What's unacceptable is not knowing a firm's position or lacking systems to identify problems while there's time to address them.

The message is clear: hope is not a strategy, and ignorance is not an excuse. Firms should implement robust financial management practices now, before the SRA makes them mandatory or before financial instability makes them irrelevant.

Brian Rogers

By Brian Rogers

Regulatory Director, Access Legal (The Access Group)

Brian Rogers FCMI is a legal risk and compliance specialist with more than 30 years of hands-on experience helping regulated legal entities meet their regulatory, compliance, and accreditation obligations. His areas of expertise span legal risk management, SRA compliance, data protection (UK GDPR), anti-money laundering (AML), and legal practice management.

With over 20 years working directly inside legal practice management, Brian brings first-hand practitioner knowledge (not just theoretical guidance) to the complex and ever-changing legal regulatory landscape. He is the creator of Access Legal Compliance system (formerly Riliance - the award-winning market-leading risk & compliance software system), one of the UK's leading compliance management systems built specifically for law firms and regulated legal entities.

Brian's expertise and leadership have been independently recognised through industry awards, including being named a Business Leader of the Year Finalist (Large Business) at the ex-Forces in Business Awards 2021 and winning the Innovation Through Technology Award at the British Chambers of Commerce Awards 2008. He is also a Member of the Association of Regulatory & Disciplinary Lawyers, further cementing his standing within the UK's legal and regulatory professional community.

Brian is a recognised authority in legal compliance, sharing his expertise through a monthly legal risk and compliance update webinar attended by more than 2,000 legal professionals every month. His updates are trusted by solicitors, compliance officers, and practice managers across the UK to stay ahead of SRA regulatory changes, AML obligations, and data protection requirements.