Biofuel subsidies not cost-effective for cutting carbon emissions
News Article - 28 August 2008
Category:
Environment
Using biofuel subsidies as a way of cutting
carbon emissions is not cost-effective,
according to a new study.
The report on biofuels and deforestation from the Policy Exchange
think tank found that halting deforestation and peatland
destruction should play a larger role in government strategy,
reports BusinessGreen.com.
It was argued in the report that the government's target of using
biofuels for five per cent of all transport fuel by 2010 will cost
the Treasury £550 million and will only reduce
carbon dioxide (CO2)
emissions by around three million tonnes,
equivalent to one tenth the output of a coal power station.
However, the report found that investing the same amount to stop
deforestation and peatland destruction would reduce
CO2 emissions by 200 million tonnes a
year.
"The debate over cost keeps getting forgotten, but government
should remember that the goal is to prevent climate change and we
need to ask what is the cheapest way of doing that," the report's
editor, Ben Caldecott, told the website.
"In that light, it is clear first generation biofuels are far too
expensive."
He also supported claims that biofuel subsidies lead to increased
deforestation, as forests are cleared to make room for energy
crops.
Article keywords:
Bookmark / share this article
More industry news
Back to news home page »